<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why are security phrases a bad idea?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://analyzingidentity.com/2010/05/19/why-are-security-phrases-a-bad-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://analyzingidentity.com/2010/05/19/why-are-security-phrases-a-bad-idea/</link>
	<description>Gerry Gebel&#039;s Identity Industry Insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:28:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://analyzingidentity.com/2010/05/19/why-are-security-phrases-a-bad-idea/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 11:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://analyzingidentity.com/?p=52#comment-20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dynamic KBA while better than static has its own challenges including but not limited to:

- Determining a credible source of data
- Adding costs associated with procuring a credible source of data
- Having to collect even more personally identifiable information such that you can query a credible source of data]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dynamic KBA while better than static has its own challenges including but not limited to:</p>
<p>- Determining a credible source of data<br />
- Adding costs associated with procuring a credible source of data<br />
- Having to collect even more personally identifiable information such that you can query a credible source of data</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naive approaches against identity theft &#171; Maarten Wegdam&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://analyzingidentity.com/2010/05/19/why-are-security-phrases-a-bad-idea/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Naive approaches against identity theft &#171; Maarten Wegdam&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 20:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://analyzingidentity.com/?p=52#comment-19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This type of static knowledge authentication is simply NOT suitable to authenticate any transaction that requires more than a very minimal level of assurance, and it is very naïve to use it for online banking (see also). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This type of static knowledge authentication is simply NOT suitable to authenticate any transaction that requires more than a very minimal level of assurance, and it is very naïve to use it for online banking (see also). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

